Plausibility
Agenda:
The speakers will explore, by reference to recent cases, including Sandoz v BMS [2022] EWHC 822 (Apixaban): the role of plausibility in revocation proceedings; does a twin attack of lack of plausibility (insufficiency) and obviousness create a “squeeze”; and, important differences in the approach of the UK Courts compared to the EPO.
Partners:
Lambert & Hornby
Webinar Date: 7 th November 2022 | Time: 2: 30 PM IST
Agenda:
The speakers will explore, by reference to recent cases, including Sandoz v BMS [2022] EWHC 822 (Apixaban): the role of plausibility in revocation proceedings; does a twin attack of lack of plausibility (insufficiency) and obviousness create a “squeeze”; and, important differences in the approach of the UK Courts compared to the EPO.
Our speakers:
John Hornby
John Hornby is a solicitor advocate with a Natural Sciences degree from the University of Cambridge. Prior to founding Lambert Hornby, spent 20 years in the IP group at a magic circle law firm (14 as a partner), before acting as a consultant in the IP field, particularly focusing on the pharmaceutical sector.
Justin Lambert
Justin Lambert has more than 20 years’ experience specialising in intellectual property matters in England and in Australia. He worked for many years as a solicitor for a magic circle firm in London before progressing his career with two of Australia’s most respected intellectual property firms. He has a background in science, having studied chemistry and pure maths, and is recognised as a leading patent lawyer.
